China is aligned with most of the governments that threaten the freedom of their own people. These same totalitarian governments (like North Korea) are often the governments that offer the most serious threats to the peace of the world community. China uses commercial ties, technology and financial muscle to manipulate many constituencies within the United States. This is the reason that, despite the well-documented evidence, so few warnings are heard releated to China’s geo-political strategy.
The following is an example of how dangerous it can be when politicians start receiving contributions from interests affiliated with foreign powers:
A company owned by a Chinese general (Poly Technologies) was actually caught illegally shipping SKS assault weapons (Chinese made assault rifles) into the U.S. during the Clinton years. Allegedly the shippers had permits to import the weapons that were approved by President Clinton right after the U.S. assault weapons ban went into effect! The Chinese weapons were probably on their way to the gangs in Southern California. The assault weapons were being shipped by a Chinese shipping firm, COSCO, that is closely affiliated with the military sector of China’s government. Indictments were issued, but the Clinton Administration never managed to prosecute the corporate officials involved. There were Chinese campaign contributions made around this time by individuals and corporations connected to the transactions.
It is not just the Chinese but other foreign and domestic interests that have been dominating the economy and the national dialogue. George Soros, a billionaire currency speculator whose origins are in Eastern Europe, invested heavily in the Obama campaign. Is Soros funding tied to Soros’ currency speculation? What about Soros’ alleged international manipulation of currencies? It is becoming increasingly clear that tax exempt foundations, financed through a complex web of interlocking interests, are dictating U.S. economic policy. For instance, the Apollo Alliance has now been identified as the source of much of the stimulous legislation that has impacted the U.S. in an unpredictable way that economists are still trying to fathom at this time.
As the U.S. currency faces a devaluation that may cause the dollar to become worthless, why hasn’t the vaunted free press told us more about Soros, a currency speculator and short seller, and how Soros, is related to Obama’s economic policies? A link to a website entitled IslamoZionism provides a fascinating outline as to how Soros' Open Society Institute allegedly has operated in tandem with shadow governments and intelligence operations, especially in former Soviet nations. IslamoZionism is apparently a hard-left, Communist website. Bearing in mind the source, the information provided demonstrates how Soros' propaganda machinery operates in tandem with deep levels of U.S. intelligence agencies at a level that is far above any familiar left-right dichotomies.
Such assertions probably sounds like fantasy at first glance. Nevertheless, several well-documented international banking scandals, including the Nugan Hand Bank, BCCI, and the Italian P2 scandals, as well as incidents like the murder of Vatican Bank's Roberto Calvi, suggest how various intelligence networks work with banks, private contractors, the Mafia, Masonic Lodges, so-called left and right-wing terrorists and even the Catholic Church. Such disparate organizations can and do link-up to bolster, subvert and/or discredit governments for reasons that are never completely clear. The links to all these operations are money-laundering and drugs. Are drugs now funding a "velvet" revolution here in the U.S.?
See The Politics of_Heroin, by Alfred W. McCoy.
According to Michelle Malkin:
The far Left Center for American Progress has its tentacles everywhere.
Know your enemy: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced a new “Chief Diversity Officer,” communications attorney Mark Lloyd.
But Doctor of Jurisprudence Lloyd is far more than merely a communications attorney. He was at one time a Senior Fellow at the uber-liberal Center for American Progress (CAP), for whom he co-wrote a June 2007 report entitled “The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio.”
Which rails against the fact that the American people overwhelmingly prefer to listen to conservative (and Christian) talk radio rather than the liberal alternative, and suggests ways the federal government can remedy this free-market created “problem.”
* Restore local and national caps on the ownership of commercial radio stations.
* Ensure greater local accountability over radio licensing.
* Require commercial owners who fail to abide by enforceable public interest obligations to pay a fee to support public broadcasting.
These last two get perilously close to the use of “localism” to silence conservative (and Christian) radio stations, about which we have been warning for quite some time.
The latest information is that the National Endowment for the Arts is reaching into the arts community and requesting agitprop artistic expressions to promote the Administration’s agenda.
We are also seeing the President going directly to school children with a message that is about Obama and the Soros driven agenda. As accusations against “astroturfers” that display “brownshirt” tendencies at Town Hall Meetings get more strident, all this agitation and adulation on behalf of the presidential agenda suggests a replay of Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution!
One aspect of the Obama administration that is becoming apparent is that there are so many non-government organizations that are connected at the hip to the President. Many of the communications that seem to originate from the President’s operations may be coming from people that take advantage of the apparent ease with which statements can be posted. Maybe this is by design? In the intelligence world this is called plausible deniability.
According to Michelle Malkin:
The controversies surrounding Van Jones (the Obama Administration’s Communist Green Jobs Czar) have become a case in point. Jones, who also emerged out of a tangle of George Soros funded foundations, finally started to receive negative media attention from Fox News and the blogosphere (the New York Times will have its first article regarding the controversey tomorrow- two days after Jones' resignation). The Administration continues to defend the President’s unprecedented bid to insert his own personality into the educational process. and is back-pedaling as quickly as possible by removing Jones at this critical juncture.
The fact that the president’s speech to grade-schoolers may be followed by a green program now proposed under the rubric “No Student Left Inside” makes controversy surrounding Mr. Jones particularly critical for the Administration. The Administration is presently facing major domestic and foreign policy challenges.
Ironically, the biggest foreign policy challenge, strategy and troop levels in Afghanistan, will be determined by Obama’s ability to resolve infighting and obtain commitment to his Afghanistan policies within his own party!
See also Public Allies; A Blueprint for Obama Youth.
